2.Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

On February 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to, on the grounds that he was not hospitalized in a mental hospital, the Defendant was unable to take care of the E and the senior police officer of the Seocho-gu Police Station D Police Station D, and F, on the ground that he was not hospitalized in a mental hospital in the front of Seosan-si, Seosan-si, and that he was unable to take care of “shot and shotfing away” around the center line of the road; (b) the said police officer caused the Defendant on the grounds of the safety of the Defendant, and was able to take two times in the direction of the said police officer, and was able to take two times in the direction of the said police officer, and the said F’s hand, etc. at least three times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] are as follows: (a) the mitigation area (one month to eight months) [the special mitigation person] [the case where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor (the decision of sentence] but the defendant is the first offender and was not injured.