A. The Defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim as stated in the lower judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable because of its excessive sentencing.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, especially the credibility of the evidence, D, E’s investigation agency, and the statement in the court of the court below, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that he committed an indecent act against the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below.

Therefore, Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

B. The defendant has no criminal history of the same kind of crime.

However, there is no special change in circumstances that the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim until now, and that the court below did not determine the punishment differently from the original judgment.

In addition, in full view of the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, health status, criminal records, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit