When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year with prison labor for fraud in the Busan District Court's Dong Branch Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 12, 2018.

On November 11, 2017, around 17:50, the injured party B (the age of 51) suffered injury to the victim, such as the damage of the second fess, the damage of the fess, the fescence of the defendant, and the fescence of the defendant's hand, etc., due to the cellular phone, when the defendant's fesscence, etc. was put in a dump station operated by the defendant in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu., about two weeks of treatment.

The Defendant, at the above date and time, in a dispute with the victim as mentioned above, knife the victim’s hand by hand, and caused the victim’s head to be faced with the nearby sponsor, thereby causing approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim. In addition, the Defendant inflicted injury on the spatitis, spatitis, spaton, and spaton, etc. in need of two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The statements of witnesses B and E in the third protocol of trial;

1. Each statement of witness E and F in the fourth trial record;

1. Report on internal investigation (related to the submission of diagnosis certificate B by the suspected person);

1. Request for cooperation in investigation (verification of hospital treatment-B);

1. A criminal investigation report (to attach on-site CCTV images CDs);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Status of investigation (related to concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act of the defendant A), three copies of judgment, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a list of related cases;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the allegation is merely an unilateral assault to the victim, and does not constitute an injury by assaulting the victim as stated in the facts charged of this case.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of this case.