2. Although the defendant all of the crimes of this case was recognized, there was the record that the defendant was punished twice as a fine for the same kind of crime, in particular, with the aim of increasing the number of unlawfully and unlawfully recommended persons after being admitted as the second type of crime, the crime of this case is not likely to be committed by being provided with personal information such as 640 persons in the name and accessing the Internet F by using personal information such as ID and password and accessing it to the Internet F, and there is no special circumstance or circumstance that can be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the judgment of the court below.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, sex, growth environment, family relationship, occupation, career, economic condition, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime and the Defendant’s preparation for the examination of a public official, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.