폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, Defendant B’s fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine of 1,00,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. On March 31, 2014, at around 23:01, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the damage of property by releasing at the “G convenience store” located in the “G convenience store located in the “G convenience store,” without any justifiable reason, at which the market price was displayed at the display stand amounting to KRW 39,000,000, 1 disease, 1 disease, 3,900, the market price of which is the amount of KRW 39,00,000, and 1 disease, 52,500, the market price of which is equal to the sum of KRW 95,40,00, and 400, the market price of which is equal to KRW 5,400.
B. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.), at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and at the same time and place, the victim I (the age of 25) who is a customer, expressed the victim’s bath without any justifiable reason in view of the Defendant’s breakinging of the goods as indicated therein, and collected one Boslive forest and one human disease, which were dangerous objects displayed at the display stand, and caused injury to the victim, such as thale, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.
2. On March 31, 2014, Defendants A and B were required to present identification cards regarding violent cases by the assistant of the police box of the police station of the party who called out after receiving a report of violence in the front of the "K" located in the JJ at the time of the party branch on March 23:15, 2014.
Accordingly, Defendant A, without any particular reason, committed an act of assaulting the chest of the above M by drinking it on a hand, with the hand of the police uniform of M, without any particular reason, and committed an act of assaulting the chest of N on a left hand.
As above, Defendant A, the police officer of Defendant A, who assaulted Defendant A, tried to arrest Defendant A as a flagrant offender, was assaulted by Defendant B, who was the police officer, at the same time, “the head of the police officer, who was the police officer, shall be the head of the police officer,” and was “the head of the police officer, who was the police officer, who was the police officer.”
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with legitimate performance of duties such as police officer M, N, andO 112 reporting processing.
3. Defendant C: (a) on March 31, 2014, Defendant C.