A. The Plaintiff intended to establish a business of manufacturing other fertilizers and nitrogen compounds, which are of a size of 821.23 square meters for producing organic fertilizers, mixed with the live association, after collecting, transporting, and carrying food wastes, fish by-products, agricultural and fishery products, wastes, etc. on the ground of 6,520 square meters of 1,964 square meters of 00 square meters in the virtual 86,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

On April 7, 2009, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for approval of a project plan (hereinafter “instant application”) pursuant to Article 33(1) of the Small and Medium Enterprise Changwon Support Act and Article 22 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and received a receipt from the Defendant on April 29, 2009 (20 days).

B. On April 8, 2009, the defendant held a working-level deliberation committee on approval of the application of this case. (1) The defendant presented the opinion of "Arriness" at the Strategic Industry Group, (2) the opinion of "Supplement" on the grounds that there is no content of wastewater discharged from the clean environmental team, and (3) the opinion of "Arriness" on the ground that the agricultural technology center is an area within the mutual exchange and mutual exchange and is a clean and clean area, and all other related departments presented the opinion of "Arriness". (3) The defendant presented the opinion of "Arriness". The defendant presented a civil petition against the location of the factory subject to the application of this case by the residents who oppose the location of the factory, the Deputy Mayor of the defendant as the chairperson on April 28, 2009, and the civil petition coordination committee on approval of the application of this case cannot be classified into manufacturing business under Article 2007-53 of the Statistics Korea's notification, and the civil petition coordination committee on the production of organic fertilizers applied by the plaintiff as the residents's.

‘Unapproval Resolution' was made on the ground that it was not approved.

On April 29, 2009, the defendant did not approve the civil petition mediation committee.