However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a fwing cargo vehicle B.

On October 26, 2013, at around 19:30, the Defendant had two-lane roads prior to the Flue-gun, Song-do, the Clue-gun, the Clue-gun, the Clue-si, the Clue-si, the Clue-si, the Clue-si, the Clue-si, the Clue-

In such a case, despite the fact that a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent an accident by accurately operating the steering and steering gear of the motor vehicle, the defendant was in excess of the central line due to the negligence of neglecting it, and received the central separation zone as the front part of the motor vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused damage to the said central separation zone, etc. managed by the budget-based maintaining management office due to the foregoing negligence in the course of business, and did not take any measure at the time of the occurrence of a traffic accident by leaving the site while leaving the site without being parked in one lane where the said cargo is adjacent to the foregoing vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report and a traffic accident report;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da11448, Apr. 1, 2007);

1. Probation, order to provide community service and attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;