부당이득금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the reasoning of this case is citing the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications or re-uses.
▣ 수정하는 부분 제1심판결문 4쪽 9행 “267,770,479원”을 “267,588,279원”으로, 같은 쪽 10행 “O”를 “주식회사 국민은행”으로 수정 ▣ 다시 쓰는 부분(제1심판결문 7쪽 1행부터 12쪽 1행까지) 『가. 관련법리 배당절차에서 권리 없는 자가 배당을 받아갔다면 이는 법률상 원인 없이 부당이득을 한 것이라고 할 것이나 이로 인하여 손해를 입은 사람은 그 배당이 잘못되지 않았더라면 배당을 받을 수 있었던 사람이지 이것이 다음 순위의 배당을 받을 수 있는 사람이 있는 경우에도 채무자에게 귀속된다고 할 수 없다(대법원 2000. 10. 10. 선고 99다53230 판결 등 참조). 나. 인정사실 아래와 같은 사실은 갑 제5, 10호증(가지번호있는 것은 가지번호 포함, 이하 같다
1) On September 24, 2008, 2008, on the part of the Plaintiff’s national tax claim against the Plaintiff, the attachment registration (registration (registration) was completed on the Hri land of this case by the State, the disposition authority, and the disposition authority, on the part of the Plaintiff, prior to the commencement of the auction procedure for the instant H land (hereinafter “the first auction procedure”) as a result of the distribution in the voluntary auction procedure for the instant H land.
In addition, after the first auction procedure of this case commenced on October 22, 2008, on July 7, 2009, the Plaintiff requested the issuance of the increased tax amount to be added to 19,522,667,180 won in arrears and the increased tax amount to be added to the date of distribution.
However, on July 22, 2009, the date of distribution of the first auction procedure of this case = 267,770,479 won to be actually distributed = interest on the sales price of KRW 272 million on the sales price of this case.