도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On October 19, 200, around 02:00, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management agency by loading and operating the freight exceeding the restricted width of the freight vehicles owned by the Defendant in relation to the Defendant’s business at the inspection station of the control of the vehicle of mobile restriction on operation of the 35 line national highway Dopo-ri National Road No. 35 in Yangsan-si, Dong-si.
2. The Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga, 14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (merger) decided October 28, 2010, applied by a prosecutor to the facts charged in the instant case (amended by Act No. 4920 of January 5, 1995, and was amended by Act No. 7832 of December 30, 2005) in Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of December 30, 2005), “When an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the relevant Article.
“The Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality that the part is in violation of the Constitution, and thereby, the above provision of the law was retroactively invalidated in accordance with the main sentence of Article 47(3) of the Constitutional Court Act.
Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a crime, and thus, is not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.