However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 24, 2013, around 09:30 on December 24, 2013, the Defendant interfered with business, at the C convenience store located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, a husband, who has a son’s hand on the bonds, received shock and drinks alcohol at home, and drinks alcohol at the above convenience store after drinking alcohol.

Under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant interfered with the duty of convenience points by force for about 6 hours, such as breathing time expenses to customers who have been in convenience stores and entering the convenience store, breathing them, and raising them on the floor by placing them on the floor.

2. The Defendant damaged property damage caused damage by removing D, an employee of convenience store, by interfering with the convenience store business according to the date, time, place, and method mentioned in paragraph (1) above, by removing D, which was an employee of convenience store, and taking home home, to the floor of the product equivalent to KRW 131,600 of the market price owned by the victim E, the business owner of which was at convenience store, one set of calculating machine amounting to KRW 219,00,000 of the market price, and one set of product amounting to KRW 103,350 of the market price in the display stand.

3. The Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender, such as the crime of interference with business, etc., to G police officers assigned to the police box of the Mapo-dong Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving the notification of 112 at the time, place, and at the scene.

During the 112 patrol box along with G, the Defendant: (a) was aboard the said 112 patrol box with G, and was in the F patrol box, the Defendant: (b) took the 112 patrol box; (c) took a bath to the victim; and (d) took the victim’s “weet ............” (c) asked the victim’s left part of the box to have a hole of size on the left part of the victim; (d) assaulted the victim’s head to have the front part of the knive part of the knive part of the knive part; (e) interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of the flagrant offender on five occasions by drinking; and (e) interfered with the victim G with the inspection of the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of the police against D and G 1.