손해배상(의)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. On October 31, 2013, at the Defendant’s operating hospital, the Plaintiff was in charge of the testothmon injection of the testoty composition (hereinafter “the instant injection”) that is prescribed in the symptoms of male pite on the right traw, butther, from the assistant nurse.
B. On August 1, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a legacy by the following: (a) the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a part of the c hospital’s right-hand cata and the cata and the right-hand cata; and (b) the cata and cata of the cata and the c
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 6 evidence, Eul evidence 2 and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination as to the cause of action
A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was not only the Defendant’s duty of care to thoroughly disinfect the injection of the instant injection to the Plaintiff, but also the Plaintiff neglected to perform his duty of care to prevent malicious results, such as dynasium, considering the thickness of the Plaintiff’s surrounding land and the local floor, and the Plaintiff caused the symptoms of the instant injection due to the negligence in the process of administering the instant injection. The Plaintiff did not explain the side effects of the instant injection treatment, such as blood species, infection, and psychotropic damage.
B. We examine the existence of negligence in the medical procedure, the above evidence, Eul evidence Nos. 4-1 through 12, and each request for the examination of the medical records, physical examination, and physical supplementation to the D Association Head of this court and the Director of the Dental Hospital of Chungcheong National University, and the overall purport of the pleadings, i.e., the following circumstances: ① there is no evidence to deem that the instant injection devices used by the Plaintiff were infected or contaminated; ② The appraisal of the medical records shows that the Plaintiff contributed to the aggravation of the symptoms caused by the instant injection treatment; on the other hand, the Plaintiff’s blood dissemination of infections in the place where the right side side side is flick and flick and the Plaintiff was flick and flick and flick flick flick flick flurd.