2. The judgment of the court below appears to have made an adequate decision by fully considering all the circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, even though there were a number of criminal records including the same crime, the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, and the defendant received a letter from the victim after the crime, and taking account of the defendant's age, character and behavior, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., and there are no special circumstances to the extent to change the sentencing ex post facto. Thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.