beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.10.26 2017고단1966

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant shall obtain money from the applicant C to the applicant C, KRW 380,000, and the applicant D for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 9, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court, and was released on September 30, 2016 at the Seoul Southern District Court on the parole on September 30, 2016 during the execution of the sentence, and the parole period expired on November 19, 2016.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 1966" had a mind to acquire money from victims through Internet goods fraud in order to raise living expenses, etc.

On March 1, 2017, the Defendant posted a false statement on the fact that he had access to the cell phone from Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, etc. to sell shoess, and reported the sales text to the victim H who had contacted with the victim H by reporting 370,000 won.

However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to sell faith as agreed to by the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 370,000 won from the injured party under the same day as the price for the goods.

In addition, the defendant from February 18, 2017 to the same year.

4. Until May 1, 200, the victims received total of KRW 8,223,00 from the victims over a total of 30 times as shown in the annexed list of crimes (1).

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive the property.

On February 10, 2017, the Defendant reported that the victim F(16 years of age) would purchase the “clock pd 56-295” on the Internet website around February 10, 2017, and contacted the victim to sell the visual price in sight.

“False speech” was made.

However, the defendant did not have the above visibility, and even if he receives the visual price from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the visual activity to the injured party.

On the same day, the defendant was paid KRW 320,00 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (I) in the name of the defendant in the name of the victim.

In this respect, the defendant deceivings the victim to take property.