2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On January 20, 2008, the Plaintiff sold to the Defendant the land 365.9 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) owned by the Plaintiff for KRW 240 million.

B. On March 13, 2008, the Defendant prepared and delivered to the Plaintiff a loan certificate stating that “The rent shall be KRW 100 million and the price of the instant land shall not be repaid, and shall be repaid until December 30, 2008,” which read that “the Plaintiff shall pay the rent shall be KRW 100 million and the price of the instant land shall be repaid by December 30, 2008” (Evidence 1).

C. On the same day, the Plaintiff had completed the registration of ownership transfer of the said land in the future of the Defendant on the same day, even though he did not receive any balance of KRW 100 million with the Defendant’s horse.

However, the defendant does not pay the above amount for ten years after the lapse of ten years.

The defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff KRW 100 million and damages for delay.

2. Determination

A. In addition to the statement No. 3 and witness D’s testimony, considering the overall purport of the pleading, D’s selling of the above land under the Plaintiff’s name to E, which was the husband of the Defendant at the time of January 20, 208, D’s selling of the above land to E, who was the husband of the Plaintiff, as of January 20, 208, and D’s completing the registration of transfer of ownership on the instant land in the future of the Defendant, who was the wife of E, on March 13, 2008, without receiving any balance of KRW 100 million from E, and E’s death on

B. The Plaintiff submitted the evidence of his argument that 100 million won claim was presented to the Defendant, but the Defendant did not have prepared the above loan certificate, and even according to the witness D’s testimony, the above loan certificate was written by E in the form of E along with E, and the seal affixed to the Defendant’s name is not clearly memory as to whether the Defendant was directly aware of the fact that E was the Defendant.

Therefore, the above loan certificate is a document to prove the authenticity.