beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.06.13 2017고단1302

부정수표단속법위반등

Text

1. The defendant shall be sentenced to one year of imprisonment and a fine of five million won for the crimes of the 3-A, 4-7.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court Branch Branch Branch, Incheon District Court, on February 5, 2015, sentenced four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Incheon District Court, and the period of parole on October 28, 2015 during the execution of the sentence was expired on December 6, 2015. On July 6, 2016, the Defendant was released on October 28, 2015 at the Seoul Southern District Court, and was sentenced to one year of a suspended sentence for a violation of business affairs by the Seoul Western District Court on July 14, 2016.

Meanwhile, on September 1, 2016, the Defendant was indicted for fraud against the Seoul Southern District Court. On September 22, 2016, the Defendant was indicted for the same offense with the same court on September 22, 2016, and was not detained for the same offense in the same court on November 17, 2016, and was detained for the same offense in the same court on December 19, 2016, and is currently pending trial.

[2] The Defendant, from February 2016 to August 2016 of the same year, graduated from the Cheongdong University, and did not possess any special property. However, the Defendant, despite having graduated from the department of business management at the school of a year, the J made a false statement to the effect that the assets amount to KRW 3,200,000,00 including real estate, including Seoul Mapo-gu apartment, after graduating from the university, the assets amount to KRW 3,200,00,000 including real estate.

After obtaining the trust of theJ, the Defendant received money from theJ or received money from theJ by using a credit card or mobile phone of theJ to make a settlement of small amounts, on the grounds that it is necessary for theJ to take money in the course of its business, and that money to be used in a lawsuit for refund of real estate tax is necessary.

In addition, as above, the Defendant began to doubt the Defendant who continued to demand money from J in the course of receiving money from J, and the Defendant’s Internet is to know about the fact.