If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 00:51 on January 14, 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by publicly insultingd the victim by stating that “the victim of the police station affiliated with the Seoul Heavy Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report on the issue of Hoppline and the Dap claim, was drunkly drunk to the victim D, who was called the victim of the Seoul Heavy Police Station, hump owner, customer, and reporter.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.