(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Defendant A: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act): Decision of deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the statements in the evidence Nos. 1 and 6 against Defendant B, Defendant B is jointly and severally liable to pay the same amount of indemnity as stated in paragraph (1) of the Disposition.

Defendant B asserted that there was an amount of additional repayment other than the amount claimed by the Plaintiff as repayment, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this (the details appropriated by the Plaintiff as repayment is the basis for calculating damages for delay in attached Form. The Plaintiff appears to have received payment of KRW 3,209,315 on December 12, 2013 in relation to the previous prize in this case). The above assertion by Defendant B is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim is reasonable and it is so decided as per Disposition.