추심금
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked.
2. The plaintiff's claim as to the above cancellation part is dismissed.
Basic Facts
The obligee: The obligee: the obligor’s claim amount of KRW 9,428,700: The obligation to seize KRW 9,700 against the Defendant: the Plaintiff, on June 2, 2015, issued a collection order for the attachment and collection of the following claims (hereinafter referred to as “instant collection order”) with respect to the lease deposit claim against the Defendant of the Gyeonggi-do Yang-gun D and 102 E (hereinafter “instant real estate”).
The original copy of the instant collection order was served on June 5, 2015 on the Defendant.
【Ground of recognition” did not have any dispute, written evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleading of the Plaintiff was served on the Defendant, who is the garnishee, as the collection order of this case was issued.
C is the actual lessee who rents the instant real estate from the Defendant and operates the licensed real estate agent office at this place (C submitted a lease contract prepared with the Defendant to the head of the competent tax office upon filing an application for business registration regarding the above licensed real estate agent office). Since the collection claim of the instant collection order (C’s claim for refund of lease deposit against the Defendant), the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the collection amount of KRW 9,428,700 and the delay damages therefrom.
Judgment
The fact that the collection order of this case was issued and delivered to the defendant who is the third debtor was earlier.
The evidence No. 3 cannot be used as evidence for the existence or absence of any evidence to prove the authenticity of the collection claim.
In addition, according to the evidence Nos. 3 and 4, C is a lessee of the instant real estate, and C is registered as a licensed real estate agent office in the instant real estate. However, although it is recognized that C is operating a licensed real estate agent office in the instant real estate, it is insufficient to recognize the above fact as a party to the instant real estate lease agreement, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge
Rather, each entry of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 is written.