The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

After finding facts as indicated in its reasoning based on its adopted evidence, the lower court determined that the instant disposition, which rejected the Plaintiff’s claim for medical care benefits, was lawful on the ground that the Plaintiff’s refusal to accept the claim for medical care benefits, cannot be seen as an occupational accident on the grounds that proximate causal link between the Plaintiff’s 4-5-6 and the Plaintiff’s 4-6 escape certificate cannot be found.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal doctrine and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine, thereby failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.