2. The fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflected his mistake, that some of the crime was committed in attempted crimes, and that part of the damaged part was returned to the victim, etc. are considered favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant by force or theft of another person's property over several occasions and causing bodily injury to some victims in the process, and there is a substantial risk of the act.

The defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, and has committed the crime of this case in addition, even though he is under repeated crime period.

These circumstances are disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of such circumstances and other factors of sentencing as the scope of recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, and motive and circumstance of the crime in this case, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.