B The Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won, and a fine of 2,00,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Defendant

B is the actual owner of E 110cc Ora, and Defendant A is the line and the post-line, known to and with B, from Mapo-gu.

F (A) On February 14, 2016, 2015, a student who was a part-time student at the above skin, was driving the above Oral Ba, and was driving by H on February 14, 2016, in violation of the an alley road for one-way traffic without the front line of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, thereby violating the prohibition of entry into the an alley road, and proceeding from the offline of the network, to the offline of the Dong-dong community service center at an aesthetic speed.

I amburged part of the front part of the damaged vehicle, and Do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do without taking necessary measures after destroying the parts of the vehicle equivalent to approximately KRW 934,608.

1. Defendant B, around February 14, 2016, on the 20:16-ro 20:20:16, 2016, driven the above Haba on the alley-ro 22 Han River from Mapo-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Mapo-gu, 8.22 Han River-ro, with F’s telephone contact that the accident occurred, and had the Defendant A, who was aware of the violation of the limited special agreement above 30 years of age or older, passed a resolution that he would drive the Haba, who was the driver of the Hababa in the accident site, and made a false statement as Defendant A’s criminal of the above traffic accident at the J District Ha, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report 112, as if Defendant A was the offender

In the end, for the F who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, Defendant A voluntarily surrenders to the police as if the crime was committed, thereby aiding and abetting the criminal.

2. Defendant A knew that the fact of the temporary border stated in the preceding paragraph was that the F was in violation of and proceeding with a one-way alley road while driving under a license without permission, and that the F was in violation of and proceeding with a traffic accident.

Nevertheless, according to Defendant B’s request as referred to in the preceding paragraph, the police officer sent to the scene of the accident was made by making a false statement as if he had caused a traffic accident by driving the above Oba, thereby allowing the police officer to escape F as an offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each of the Defendants’ respective legal statements.