beta
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2015.01.14 2013나596

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Claim for confirmation of the absence of monetary obligation in the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff's I account.

Reasons

The Plaintiff’s transaction details according to the Defendant’s account book have opened a deposit account and loan account from the beginning of the 2000s, and conducted financial transactions with the Defendant. The Plaintiff’s account opening, termination, and transaction relation are as listed below.

1. On December 13, 200, No. 201: (a) No. 7. 1: (b) No. 7. 5 of the Account; (c) No. 2; (d) No. 2. 7. - No. 1 of the Account No. 1 of the Deposit No. 1 of the Deposit No. 2 of the Deposit No. 2 of the Deposit No. 2 of the Deposit No. 3 of the Deposit No. 2 of the Deposit No. 7 of the Deposit No. 2 of the Deposit No. 1 of the Deposit Account No. 2 of the Deposit No. 1 of the Deposit No. 2 of the Deposit No. 3 of the Deposit No. 1 of the Deposit No. 5 of the Deposit No. 2 of the Deposit No. 70; and (e) No. 7. 2 of the Deposit No. 1 of the Deposit No. 5 of the Bank of Korea No. 8. -1 of the Deposit No. 2 of the Deposit No. 2 of the Deposit Account;