On February 2, 2017, the Defendant stated that B, who is an employee of C, is a clerical error in the G indictment, which is a director of F (hereinafter referred to as “F”) of the complainant F (hereinafter referred to as “F”) who is a equipment supplier, at a non-permanent place.

Before the end of April 2017, the Plaintiff concluded a supply contract stating that “To receive payment for completed portion from D, the ordering entity, at the end of April 2017, the delivery of the water distribution machine at the construction site at the same time, and to pay the price for completed portion.”

However, at the same time, C has reached KRW 1.9 billion in the supply price that was not paid to the suppliers of 38 materials at the construction site in the Dong-gu, Dong-gu, 2000, and even if the bonds, which had been urged to repay, have been paid in advance from D and have been used for the supply price of the above companies and the repayment of bonds, etc., even if the bonds, which had been urged to pay in advance, were paid in KRW 300,000,00,000, it did not have any intent or ability to pay in

As such, the Defendant deceivings the complainant into the company, and from March 11, 2017, the same year.

4. Until December 22, 200, a total of KRW 86,592,00 has been supplied with a hot water distribution instrument equivalent to a total of KRW 86,592,00 and has

around March 2017, the Defendant A, at the C office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H and the second floor, had the complainant construct the East E apartment in the Dongbcheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, and 42 lots of land.

The end of the next month of the delivery of piping materials until the completion of the construction.