If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On June 7, 2011, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daejeon District Court Seosan Branch.

At around 20:40 on August 24, 2020, the Defendant driven DNS car from around 5 km to C in the direction of alcohol 0.040% under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement and the defendant's circumstantial statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify the results of drinking driving control;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of the order of provisional payment is that the defendant's blood alcohol density, the distance of drunk driving, the time and contents of his previous offense, the occurrence of a traffic accident, and the age, character and conduct, criminal records, criminal records, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered by taking into consideration all the circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, such as