A. The Plaintiff and the Defendants shared 774m2 (hereinafter “instant land”) in proportion to each share indicated in the attached Table of co-ownership ratio.

B. On the instant land, there is a concern that the exchange value may be significantly reduced if the instant land is divided in kind due to the installation of a mobile communication relay device.

[Grounds for recognition] Defendant G Co., Ltd.: Each of the descriptions set forth in A1 through 9, and the remainder of the purport of the entire pleadings: Confession

2. According to the above facts of determination, it is reasonable to deem that it is difficult or inappropriate to divide the instant land in kind, and therefore, it is reasonable to sell the said land at auction and distribute the remaining amount after deducting auction expenses from the price to the Plaintiff and the Defendants according to their respective shares of co-ownership.

3. In conclusion, it is decided as per Disposition by deciding to pay the above land in installments as above.