If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant is a customer B, who has been a customer B, and the victim C (55) is a operator of LBC, the victim D (52) and the victim E (48 years old) are the RabC.

1. On March 21, 2017, the Defendant suffered injury from the Victim C at B Rab Kaf, located in F at Sin interesting 03:30 on March 21, 2017, while the business was completed, the Defendant changed.

D. D. C. B. B. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H

2. The Defendant damaged the property at the same time and place as the above paragraph 1, so that the amount equivalent to KRW 1,130,000 of the cost of repair is equal to the cost of repair by destroying the victim C’s reflect cycle, kidboard, microf, etc. by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for C, D, and E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the written estimate and receipt statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for negligence;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.