except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 22:40 on July 18, 2014, the Defendant driven a BFD car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 27 km from the section of about 27 km Seoul Gangdong-ro 80-13 to the upper speed road at the Sungnam-si, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.147%.

2. On July 18, 2014, the Defendant of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents driven a car above the Radon on a 22:40-lane, while driving the car at the above Radon and driving the 5-lane 4-lane 5-lane 80-gil 13, Seoul Gangdong-gu, Seoul, along the 3-lane 60-km speed from the upper body to the upper body.

At all times, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reducing speed and driving safely by safely examining the front side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol as stated in paragraph (1) by negligence, found that the victim C (the age of 29) was driven by the victim C (the age of 29) prior to his/her failure to stop according to the red signal and took a sudden action to stop the vehicle. However, the Defendant did not avoid it, but did not go beyond the part behind the above vehicle's right-hand part, and did not go beyond the lower part of the vehicle's upper part.

The Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s negligence in the course of performing such occupational duties, such as a fluoral chilling of a dratulation, which requires approximately six weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report (1), (2);

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the Investigation Report (Application of Badmark);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose the penalty, and Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 3 (2) 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act, which increases concurrent crimes;