If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On June 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) visited the D’s “D” of the operation of the Sinung-si, Sinung-si; (b) visited the Defendant to the inside and outside of the kitchen; (c) laid off the ice lease material, which is a dangerous object from the facility; and (d) laid off the ice, which is a dangerous object from the facility; and (d) laid off the ice flick, 112 meters in total; (d) while the Defendant flicked the flick on the site after receiving a 112 report, the Defendant flicked the flick of the Sinung-si Police Station E box belonging to the Sinung-si, which was sent to the site; and (d) if the flick was not set off from the flick G.

수 차례 경고를 받았음에도, 이에 불응하면서 위 경찰관들에게 “ 쏴 봐, 쏴 봐 ”라고 대항하다가 급기야 왼손에 들고 있던 위 튀김 거름망을 위 경찰관들을 향해 집어 던졌다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by two police officers on the handling of reported duties.

2. The Defendant damaged property by inserting up the fluoral ties in the time and place described in paragraph 1, as described in paragraph 1, while putting the fluoral leash as described in paragraph 1, the victim C, a business owner of “D”, into oil, thrown away them into oil, and destroying the utility of the fluoral fluoral fluor who was in custody of alcoholic beverages by gathering the luoral fluoral fluor to police officers, and fluoring the fluoral fluoral fluor’s glass part.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement against G or C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as site and photographs of damage;

1. Articles 144, 136 (1) (a point of obstructing the performance of special official duties) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s failure in sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is boomed.