The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged (excluding the part not guilty of the grounds for appeal) on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the recognition and intent of false facts, “the purpose of being elected”, and “career” in the crime of violating Article 250(1)

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.