If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

피고인은 2014. 12. 7. 23:15경 안양시 만안구 B에 있는 피해자 C(여, 59세) 운영의 D 포장마차에서 술에 취한 채 다른 손님들에게 욕을 하며 시비를 하여 112 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰관이 귀가조치 하였으나 잠시 후 다시 찾아와 맥주잔을 테이블 위에 내리쳐 맥주잔 2개가 깨지고 그 유리 파편이 꼼장어 등 음식물에 튀게 하는 등 약 2시간 동안 행패를 부려 여러 명의 손님들이 나가도록 하는 등 위력으로 피해자의 포장마차 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs on damage scenes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Not only has the record of having been punished several times for the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but also has reoffended during the period of suspension of execution due to the same crime. However, in light of the fact that the suspension of execution is used by the victim, the degree of the power of this case, etc., it seems somewhat harsh to invalidate the suspension of execution due to the instant case, and the amount of the fine as stated in the disposition of the prosecution is determined.