용역비
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. "In the disposition of the first instance court" in paragraph (1) of the same Article.
1. According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 1’s statement and the entire argument as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff entered into an agency agreement with the Defendant to delegate duties for tax adjustment from January to March 2014, and agreed to receive KRW 220,000 per month from April 2014 to April 2014 as remuneration, and completed the agency duties for tax adjustment from January 2014 to June 2014, and the Defendant did not pay KRW 7,227,000 out of the agreed remuneration to the Plaintiff.
According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 7,227,00 won and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from January 14, 2016 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order, as the plaintiff seeks.
Although the defendant asserts that he paid all the above remuneration, there is no evidence to acknowledge the defendant's assertion, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
2. If so, the Plaintiff’s claim is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and thus, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed. In the judgment of the court of first instance, it is obvious that “ December 19, 2015” in Article 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance is a clerical error in the text of “ January 14, 2016.” Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition.