A. Defendant B: the real estate listed in Section 1 of [Attachment];

B. Defendant C shall set out in attached list 2.

A. The parties 1) The plaintiff is entitled to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”).

The name of the administrative district was changed from the Michuhol-gu Incheon Metropolitan City on July 1, 2018 to the "Seo-gu" in accordance with the Michuhol-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

(2) The project implementation district (hereinafter “instant project implementation district”) is 129,323 square meters in G G day.

(2) The Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter referred to as the “Maintenance Project”);

on October 4, 2010, Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the "Seoul Metropolitan City head") shall implement the project.

(2) The Defendants are owners of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) located in the instant project implementation district, and Defendant C (B prior to the name of each of the real estate), real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”), and Defendant C (D prior to the name of each of the real estate), real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”), and Defendant C (the name of each of the real estate), real estate listed in the separate sheet (2), real estate listed in the separate sheet (3), and Defendant F own and possess each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (4).

B. On August 8, 2016, the remaining head of the Si/Gun/Gu authorized the implementation of the instant rearrangement project on the same day, and publicly notified it to I for the public notice on the same day. 2) On June 19, 2017, the head of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City approved the management and disposal plan of the instant rearrangement project and publicly notified it to J for the public notice on the same day.

C. (1) On November 8, 2016 and December 16, 2016, the Plaintiff publicly announced that members, such as land or building owners within the instant rearrangement project implementation zone, should file an application for parcelling-out and report on rights. (2) The Defendants were eligible for cash settlement because they did not file an application for parcelling-out within the said period.