손해배상(기)
1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff A, KRW 3,418,100, and KRW 1,000,000, and each of the said money.
1. Basic facts
A. Plaintiff A, Defendant D, and G (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant students”) were students of J High School in 2013 and 2014 located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and Plaintiff B, Defendant E, and F are the parents of Defendant G, respectively.
B. On March 5, 2014, Plaintiff A sent a report of school violence to J High School on the ground that he/she insultingd Plaintiff A from Jun. 2, 2013 to Mar. 5, 2014 on the ground that he/she insultingd Plaintiff A from Jun. 2013, to Mar. 2014, 2014, and filed a complaint with the investigative agency on March 10, 2013.
C. On March 31, 2014, J High Schools held the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence, and the said Committee imposed on Defendant students each of the following dispositions: “In writing, ten days of service at school, four hours of special education for students,” and “four hours of education for guardians” on Defendant parents.
On October 23, 2014, Defendant students were sent to the Suwon District Court as juvenile protection cases, and on October 23, 2014, rendered a disposition to the effect that “Defendant students are entrusted to the care and custody of each guardian, each of the Defendant students is entrusted to the care and custody of each guardian, and each of the Defendant students is ordered to provide the Defendant’s parents with special education for 26 hours, respectively (2014 Pu1960, 1961).”
E. Meanwhile, from March 17, 2014 to April 3, 2014, Plaintiff A received counseling through six days at “the Center” in the Gyeonggi-do Seoul District Office of Education, and submitted a written withdrawal to J High School on April 15, 2014 that Plaintiff A voluntarily retired from school violence due to “school violence damage.”
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap6 through 9, 12, 13, 15 evidence (including provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul 1 and 14 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether to recognize liability for damages;
A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion (1) is that the defendant student from June 2013 to the plaintiff A “I” without any justifiable reason. < Amended by Act No. 11837, Jun. 2, 2013>