도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 14, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving alcohol) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) on the following occasions: (a) 62:20, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with a DNA window omomom, with the alcohol concentration of about 0.053%, without obtaining a driver’s license from around 500 meters from the road near the 61st century in front of the North Korean Peninsula, and from the road in front of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Gyeong-gun.
2. At the time specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on the front side of the Gyeongjin-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (b) as indicated in paragraph 1, the slope F of the Police Station E box affiliated with the police box, and F of the same affiliated police station G, etc., the Defendant stated that the Defendant was the Defendant’s third degree of influence as stated in paragraph 1 of this Article; (c) stated that the Defendant was the Defendant’s third degree of influence; and (d) stated that the Defendant was the Defendant’s third degree of influence as stated in paragraph 1 of this Article; and (d) stated that the Defendant was the Defendant’s third degree of influence as stated in the same written statement of the driver’s statement made by the State F of the State; and (e) stated the name of H with the pen issued by the F of the confirmation document that recognized the results of drinking; and (e) issued the Defendant’s signature on the name.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged and exercised a letter of confirmation under H, which is a private document on fact certification.
3. On June 14, 2017, at around 22:31, the Defendant: (a) signed the Defendant’s third degree of H’s signature on a portable device (PDA) presented by G, who was requested by G to have an electronic signature of the notification of the result of driving control on drinking at the places indicated in paragraph (2) around June 14, 2017; and (b) issued G who was aware of the forgery as if the signature forged was genuine.
Accordingly, the Defendant forged and used H’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.
Summary of Evidence
[Article 1] Defendant’s legal statement.