Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On May 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00, on the street in front of the building of the “Yongnam-gun Branch” located in Yong-Namnam-gun, Yong-gun; (b) received a request from the Defendant’s candidate D’s election campaign cause to help install a banner for D candidate from the Party E; and (c) took the bridge over the bridge by equally setting up the bridge and lending the bridge.

Around 22:30 on May 21, 2014, the Defendant discovered that at the above location, G et al., the reason for the election campaign of the F candidate F, who was affiliated with the Defendant, sought to install a banner of the F candidate in the front seat that he set up on the bridge, “this son, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of which

검사는 공소장에 ‘피고인은 계속하여 F 후보의 현수막 한쪽 끝을 잡은 채 2회에 걸쳐 잡아당겼고, 이로 인하여 F 후보의 현수막은 가운데 부분이 50cm 가량 찢어져 사용할 수 없게 되었다’고 기재하여 피고인이 고의로 F 후보의 현수막을 찢어 훼손한 것으로 보았고, 이를 뒷받침하는 증거로 G에 대한 경찰 진술조서(‘피고인이 사다리를 발로 차서 사다리와 엉켜 있던 현수막이 도랑으로 떨어졌고 이를 그대로 뒀으면 현수막이 훼손되지는 않았을 텐데 피고인이 일부러 잡아당겨 찢어지게 한 것으로 고의로 훼손한 것으로 생각합니다’는 취지로 진술)를 제시하고 있다.

However, the defendant consistently considered in the investigative agency to set up a banner, which has been consistently. However, the defendant did not go against the tension of the banner under the sloping.

E가 계속 잡아당기면 끊어질 수 있으니 잡아당기지 말라고 해서 이를 멈췄고, E가 하천으로 내려가 사다리를 치우고 현수막을 건져오니...