상해
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) the Defendant was assaulted by D to prevent the assaulted by D; (b) and (c) did not inflict any injury upon D by breaking the flaps of d, face, etc.
Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous.
2. Determination
A. On January 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 19:53, the Defendant suffered injury, such as cages and cages, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim, by putting flaps of the victim into flaps by drinking flaps; and (b) taking flaps of flaps; and (c) taking flaps of flaps, flaps, flaps, and flaps of flaps, etc., into drinking flaps.
B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged based on the evidence in its judgment.
(c)
The lower court’s judgment and the lower court’s judgment are as follows. ① The victim consistently stated from the investigative agency to the lower court that “the Defendant was satisfing and sating satisfing with satch with satch with satch with satch with satch,” and ② immediately after the Defendant and the victim satisfed with the police station, saturd with the victim’s satisf was observed on January 22, 2016, following the instant facts charged. The victim was issued a written diagnosis of injury to the Defendant or the victim’s satfing, satfing, satching, satching, satching, satched with satch with satch, satch with satch with satch with satch with each other; ③ According to CCTV images at the time of the instant charges, the victim’s satisfing or sating the Defendant and the victim.