However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:10 on June 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) while making a stay at D cafeteria and drinking alcohol, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, who is a dangerous object on the table, on the ground that the victim was her desire to take a part of the Defendant, on the part of the victim, on the ground that the victim was her fluore at the D cafeteria located in C, and that the victim was her fluore, which is a dangerous object on the table. (b) On the part of the victim, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, on the part of the victim, on the part of her fluore, to undergo treatment for about one week.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A report on internal investigation (six pages of investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning a crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (not heavier than the degree of injury, and taking into account the agreement with the victim);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution. (Consideration of the above circumstances and the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;