except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 20:50 on March 8, 2016, the Defendant was obliged to reduce the speed and accurately operate the steering direction and the steering direction and operation of the steering gear to prevent the traffic accident in advance by checking and driving the safety of the course and operating the steering direction and operation of the steering gear. The Defendant had a duty of care to prevent the traffic accident in advance.

Nevertheless, if the driver neglected this and did not look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the pedestrian signal is found to be late behind the victim F (the age of 68) from the right side of the defendant's running in order to avoid this, the driver operated the crosswalk in order to avoid this, but did not avoid it, the part of the victim's right and the part of the front side of the above vehicle, which led the victim to go beyond the opposite on the road of the opposite side, and thereby, the Hggggal-ro of the G driver's driving driving driving in the direction of the north Bgale distance, led the victim to go beyond the right side of the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the above occupational negligence, i.e., double alley, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on internal investigation (Attachment of black studs to black straws) and investigation report (an investigation into CCTV images of the I company);

1. Results of the appraisal request report and the traffic accident analysis report of the Road Traffic Authority;

1. A corpse of corpse;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of accident vehicles;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The victim under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act also has been negligent in crossing the crosswalk without permission in violation of the pedestrian signal at night, and the damage compensation shall be made through the taxi mutual aid.