However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On November 17, 2014, the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the freight truck B. On the other hand, while driving the above freight vehicle around 06:16 on November 17, 2014 and driving the front road in front of C in the vicinity of the subway Station, the Defendant failed to stop and take necessary measures, even though he was able to receive the said freight lanes from the victim D, who was parked on the right side of the direction due to occupational negligence and neglected to perform the duty of e-car in the front direction while driving the above freight vehicle on the front of C at the vicinity of the subway Station.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of next time inquiry (19 pages of investigation records);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. The sentence is imposed as ordered in consideration of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., although the Defendant had the same criminal record for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and the Defendant’s vehicle is covered by mandatory insurance, and other conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, such as the Defendant’s age