beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.04.27 2016고단988

사기

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

This judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A caused an accident involving intentional reception of vehicles, etc. violating the signal, and attempted to obtain insurance proceeds from the insurance company to which the other party driver was a party, by pretending to be the victim of the traffic accident.

Accordingly, on May 29, 2008, the above defendant was driving a F station distance of F station E at Won-si around 10:00 on May 29, 2008 from the south side of the market to the main station of the city, while following the vehicle.

Although the I car of H driving was operated rapidly to see the Defendant’s passenger car and received the part behind the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the above damaged vehicle, the Defendant’s vehicle was reported as if it was a normal traffic accident and submitted a medical certificate and a written estimate to the victim Samsung T&T Insurance Co., Ltd., and claimed the insurance money. This is to obtain the above damaged company’s pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 2,731,890 in total in terms of medical expenses, agreed money, repair expenses, etc. from around 43 times to April 6, 2016, each of them acquired the pecuniary benefits of KRW 319,242,390 in total from the victim and the victimized company for the purpose of medical treatment and agreement.

2. Defendants A and B conspired to commit a joint crime by intentionally taking advantage of the vehicle that violated the signal, etc., and by pretending to be the victim of the traffic accident, to receive insurance money from the insurance company to which the other driver was a party.

A. On January 29, 201, at around 06:30 on January 29, 201, the Defendants: (a) drive the J-winging vehicle in the Douco distance located in the Dou-Eup, Go-gu, Go-si; and (b) found that the Defendant B driven the K-driving vehicle while he was accompanied by the said towing vehicle; and (c) found that the vehicle behind the K-driving vehicle, the parts of the Defendant’s driving vehicle are behind the said damaged vehicle.