손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's incidental appeal and the defendant's appeal are all dismissed.
2. The costs of incidental appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
1. The grounds for the plaintiff's incidental appeal and the grounds for the defendant's appeal based on the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court, the recognition and determination of facts in the court of first instance is justified
Therefore, the grounds for the judgment of this court are as follows: “(d) The Defendant was dissatisfied with the above judgment and appealed to the Seoul Northern District Court 2017No94 on January 12, 2017, but was sentenced to a dismissal judgment from the above court on August 24, 2017; (d) the Defendant appealed to the Supreme Court 2017Do14218 on August 25, 2017 and is still pending in the trial of final appeal; (e) the Defendant appealed to the Seoul Northern District Court 2017No94 on January 12, 2017; (g) on August 24, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a dismissal judgment on August 25, 2017; (g) the Defendant was sentenced to a dismissal judgment on August 14, 2017; and (g) the Defendant was sentenced to a dismissal judgment on August 14, 2017; and (g) the appeal was pronounced as evidence evidence 17 subparag. 1818.
2. The decision of the first instance court is legitimate, and all incidental appeals by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.