However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 28, 2018, at around 23:00, the Defendant avoided the disturbance from the corridor B B of Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City on January 28, 2018.

“I, after receiving a report on 112, request from the Inspector D of the Incheon Training Police Station C District District District, or policeman E to state the case during the course of the site, I would like to leave the site, “I would like not to interfere with other days, I would like to cut off, I would like to receive taxes, I would like to receive and drink the case.”

The bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit.

Lins kis, widths, and several ages.

“...” Hase Hase Hase Hase, Fulna:

I am. “I am hnee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation and maintenance of order of the police officer's 112 report case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the video;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the following sentencing) of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommending] The basic area (from June to one year and six months) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties is against the defendant (the decision of sentencing is against the defendant], and the defendant does not have any criminal records of the same kind or the suspended sentence or any contingent crime, etc.