However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

During the period from August 30, 2017 to November 25, 2017, the Defendant is a person who operated a singing practice hall on the first floor of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as “Ding practice hall”) with the trade name “Ding practice hall.”

1. The Defendant is a singing practice hall operator under the Music Industry Promotion Act and takes measures to prevent fire or safety accidents. The Special Act on the Safety Control of Publicly Used Establishments imposes an obligation on a singing practice room operator, who is a publicly used establishment, to check safety facilities on a regular basis. As such, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent fire in advance, such as removing ordinary dust when using the “single-type electrical instruments” which produce high heat on the wall No. 1 of the above “Ding machine.” If there is no one, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of fire, such as preventing the occurrence of fire, by checking whether there is excessive heat from time to time.

Nevertheless, on November 25, 2017, the Defendant neglected this and caused a high heat in the instant singing room by negligence in the course of business, which neglected to turn on the “air-type electrical box box,” and caused a fire to approximately KRW 57 million, such as inside the instant singing room, office fixtures, and fixtures, on the ground that the heat line used by the said air box is melted and used so as to keep the heat from a small wave, and caused a fire to a small wave, the Defendant destroyed the above KRW 57 million.

2. The Defendant, as a singing practice business operator, was engaged in the performance of duties, resulting in death or injury in the performance of duties, and the Defendant, as described in paragraph (1), had a duty of care to inform singing customers of the occurrence of a fire in the event of a fire in the course of operating singingingings as described in paragraph (1) and to safely evacuates by providing them with an emergency exit and entrance, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to take protective measures against the victim E (61), the victim F (37 years), and G (36 years) even if the fire occurred in the above studio at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (1).