2. In light of the records, from March 5, 2010 to May 25, 2011, the Defendant used a grace amount of KRW 52,348,390 for business purposes, which had not been able to repay, as if he/she were to enter into a marriage with the victim at the end of the end of February 2010. The Defendant continued to use a grace amount of KRW 52,348,390 for business purposes even though he/she had not been able to repay, and even during the period of her return with the victim, she has agreed to a marriage ceremony in November 201, and even after around March 201, 201, he/she agreed to a marriage ceremony with H and had not been married with H, and it seems to have been due to the fact that most of the damaged funds were not married with the victim, and the victim was not able to repay due to changes in the economic situation after her lending to the child care center, but it was difficult for the victim to obtain an economic failure.

In full view of the fact that no particular circumstance can be found that the sentencing of the court below is unreasonably excessive, it does not seem that the sentencing of the court below is too excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.