In light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower judgment that found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the blanket crime, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free conviction by violating logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, the argument that there was an error in the misapprehension of the legal principles as to collection is not a legitimate ground for appeal since the defendant alleged that it was the ground for appeal or that it was not subject to the judgment by the court below ex officio.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.