2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. 1) On November 9, 2017, the Defendant filed a petition against the Plaintiffs for a trial to confirm the scope of rights of the instant patent invention by asserting that “the invention subject to confirmation is not entirely equipped with the elements of the instant patent invention, and is not included in the scope of the right of the instant patent invention.” 2) On February 23, 2018, the Intellectual Property Tribunal rendered a trial decision citing the Defendant’s passive claim to confirm the scope of rights of the instant patent invention on the ground that “the instant patent invention has a composition to control the instant patent invention in the direction to go back to the Gu Dongdong Park-dong, after turning the Mo in the event the object was laid down, and the invention subject to confirmation lacks the above composition, and thus the invention subject to confirmation does not fall under the scope of the right of the instant patent invention.”

The title of the patented invention 1) invention of this case: C2) filing date/registration date/registration number: D/ E/Patenter 3). The plaintiffs: 【Request 1 and 2 ( Deletion)】 【Request 3】 【Reception 200” means a chain (210) which connects a group of chains (230) installed in the window frame (220) of the building (220) : The exhausters (230) from the mouths (180) to open or closed the stacks (100), and the olddong (110) which control the mouths (180) and the signal inputs (120) which detects the opening or closed signalling of the stacks (180) ; 2. The above location shall be 191) and the location at which the stacks (14.1) is closed, and the above location at which the stacks are closed or closed (14.1).