소유권이전등기
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except where the following judgment is added to the defendant's new argument at the court of first instance under the third 16th of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420
2. The defendant asserts to the effect that the appraisal of the market price of each real estate of this case is unfair because it did not reflect the present officially announced price and surrounding market price. However, the appraiser's appraisal result should be respected as long as there is no obvious fault such as that the appraisal method is contrary to the empirical rule or unreasonable (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da67602, 67619, Jul. 9, 2009), and the descriptions of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 in the first instance court's appraisal of each real estate of this case are insufficient to recognize that the appraisal method is against the empirical rule or unreasonable, etc., and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise, the defendant's above assertion is rejected."
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.