No person shall, for the purpose of profit-making, have juveniles drink alcoholic beverages with customers, provide entertainment to customers by singing or dancing, or arrange or instigate such acts.

Nevertheless, at around 02:30 on January 29, 2012, the Defendant introduced juvenile G(s) and H(s) (s) (17 years old), a F news entertainment entertainment restaurant run by D, E, and 16 years old. On January 29, 2012, the Defendant found the above entertainment drinking house, receiving KRW 25,00 per hour from the customers, and allowed the said juveniles to provide entertainment to customers by drinking alcohol together with the customers, singing or dancing.

2. Assertion and determination

A. The Defendant asserted that his/her identification card face of singing machines is substitute, copied identification cards, and affixed fingerprints, etc. The Defendant thoroughly verified the personal information of singing machines, and did not let the juveniles receive the face.

B. 1) Determination on the evidence submitted by the prosecutor 1) The defendant's interrogation protocol of the police interrogation of the defendant does not admit the contents thereof, and thus inadmissible. 2) Since the defendant's interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecutor does not know G and confirmed his identification card and returned it to the juvenile, the

3 G’s statement G refers to “A” in the investigative agency’s sing clubs operated by the Defendant with male customers who drink in company with male customers, and sing and dancing, and it was not required to provide identification cards because it knows the face with male actors of a sing clubs.

The author stated that he worked for one hour at a singing club and 25,000 won from the male president was given to D.

However, G was exposed to the police on the way from which sing clubs did not work in this Court and they emitted from their matches;

The defendant himself.