When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. From around 03:00 on April 25, 2018 to around 04:0 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was destroyed by a brick, a dangerous object in India, which was located in the vicinity of the Dpoter vehicle of the victim C, who was parked in the vicinity of the vehicle in front of the Dpoter vehicle, and was 165,000 won in front of the vehicle in front of the Dpoter vehicle in front of the victim C, and was destroyed by a brick on two occasions, as described in the attached Table 1 and 2 of the Day of Crimes, the repair cost of KRW 495,000,000 in front of the victim’s vehicle.

2. From around 03:00 on April 25, 2018 to 03:00 on the same day, the Defendant destroyed 130,000 won of the repair cost to the extent of 18 times as stated in the attached Table 3 to 20, as well as the 1,543,300 won of the repair cost to the victim E, who was parked at the same place for the same reason as the above “A”, from around 04:00 on April 25, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each written statement of G, E, H, I, J, K, L, C, M, N,O, P, Q, and R;

1. Photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. The application of the investigation report (in relation to the confirmation of CCTVs), the investigation report (in relation to attachment of estimates and receipts, etc. for vehicle repairs), the investigation report (in addition to estimates in paragraph (4) of the list of crimes), the investigation report (in relation to the acknowledgement of attempted destruction and damage of property), and the application of statutes

1. Article 366 (Destruction and Damage of Articles), 369 (1), 366 (Special Destruction and Damage), 371, 366 (Attempted Destruction and Damage of Articles), and the choice of fines for crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Criminal Procedure Act;