beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2016.11.22 2016고합99

공직선거법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From August 27, 2015, the Defendant opened Rober C Round and worked as a candidate for the E-party F election in the 20th National Assembly member election. D is a person who elected as a candidate for the E-party F election in the 20th National Assembly member election.

1. On March 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) used a mobile phone at an insular location around 16:27, 2016; (b) for the purpose of preventing D from being elected despite the absence of the fact that D used a mobile phone as an external personnel of the G Political Party’s official examination committee in 2008; (c) on the same day, I, the head of the H organization in the Gu-U.S. H group in NA-U. H. posted “the third candidate” on the G party’s list in the Gu-U.S. H. H. H. 208, at the time of his school study in 2008, was regarded as the principal personnel outside the public trial. At that time, the head of the I branch published the Gu-U.S. candidate’s list that “I would go through snow in the Gu-U.S. session,” and also became a national of the Republic of Korea, “I-U.S. National Assembly member.”

2. On March 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) published false facts about D by inserting the text posted on N, a preliminary candidate for a member of the M constituency, into N, for the purpose of preventing D from being elected despite the fact that D used a mobile phone at an unspecified place in 2008, even though it did not act as an external personnel of the official examination committee of the G Party in 2008; (b) as described in paragraph (1) of the same day, I posted such text on N, a preliminary candidate for a member of the National Assembly.

3. On March 6, 2016, the Defendant used a mobile phone at an infinite place, with a view to preventing D from being elected despite the fact that D was an outside person of the Gongcheon Examination Committee of G Political Parties in 2008, even though D had not been working for the outside person, the Defendant led to the NAV C candidate’s career-based problem raising.